Request a callback
  • Our experts process over 93,000 invoices per month and we've recovered over £11m in over-charges for our clients in the last year
  • We provide support to over 500 businesses for energy and carbon management
  • Our solutions team have identified savings of £37.5m per annum for our clients, a total of 495,338,992 kWh savings identified
  • Last year we saved our CCA clients alone £25.5m

CfD: Government changes the eligibility for biomass and energy from waste schemes deployed with CHP

8th June 2018

In December 2017, the Government launched a consultation into the Contracts for Difference (CfD) scheme, ranging from the types of projects and fuel eligible for the scheme to reviewing whether the scheme is delivering best value for money.


While the full outcome of the consultation is yet to be published, the Government has this week announced its decisions around the eligibility of energy from waste schemes deployed with CHP. Our principal risk manager Matt Osborne explains what this could mean for generators.

CfD support will continue for biomass and energy from waste schemes if they are deployed with CHP. However, those applying for new CfD contracts will now be required to have a minimum 70 per cent overall efficiency (net calorific value), as well as a primary energy saving of 10 per cent (gross calorific value) and 10 per cent heat efficiency (gross calorific value). These minimum requirements now apply to plants under 25MWe as well as larger plants (in previous allocation rounds, smaller plants had no overall efficiency requirement).

“The changes are designed to ensure projects are more efficient; the existing design of the CfD scheme has meant that generators could qualify to receive support even if they were only producing a low level of useful heat and achieving low levels of overall efficiency.

“Generators that want to continue participating in the CfD scheme will need to meet the minimum efficiency requirements. Those that are unable to do this risk losing out on the financial rewards available, and should therefore look at other ways of optimising their revenue. For example, joining a virtual floor portfolio with a risk-managed strategy will allow them to budget against a protected minimum anticipated income.

“With future CfD auctions and participants likely to be dominated by more efficient generators, we could see auction results being constrained – even dampened – potentially meaning lower CfD costs for consumers. We can’t assume this will be the case however, and therefore advise all of our customers to continue to implement appropriate risk management strategies – especially in light of recent rises in commodity costs.”


Inenco believes the CfD auction process needs to be reviewed to ensure no project is paid more than necessary to keep costs as low as possible for consumers.

For more information on CfD, call us on 08451 46 36 26 or email